Analysing Sources Relevant Not too difficult to read and understand Is the writing aroused? Biased? Inaccurate? BE CRITICAL WHEN USING SOURCES: trust: Who was the reference and what was his/her purpose in writing? What arguments is the author put forward and does he/she provide enough differentiate to substitute them? Has the writer ignored licence that contradicts her/his fitpoints? Is there any evidence of bias in the information and ideas the author presents? Do another(prenominal) semens support or contradict this authors view and how does this affect the reliability and usefulness of the source? Be form about the difference between a source and the evidence that power come from it. A source provides information which might or might not be useful for the depicted object you are studying. Think about and try to identify: Who created the source and what was his/her perspective? When was it created? Where did it come from, that is, what was its origin? What is its content?
What was the motive, that is, what feelings, experiences, attitudes or obligations incited the author to create the source? What was the purpose of the source, that is, what was the creators think outcome? What is the spirit of the source [diary extract, map, letter, photograph...]? For the topic you are studying, is it a primary or a secondary source? What is the nature of the information the source provides? [fact? Opinion? Complete? Incomplete? perfect? Inaccurate? Biased? Subjective? Objective? Reliable? utilitarian? If so, what?] How useful and reliable is the source in improving our rationality of particular aspects of our study of.... (e.g. World War I) If you want to direct a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .